Helping Companies Create and Implement Services Strategies

Likeability Sells

For those of you who have attended my training related to building trust and selling services, you'll recall that one of the "six trust builders" is likeability. I espouse that things being mainly equal, the person you select to work with is the one you like better. Hence, anything that you can do to improve this trait is important to creating and strengthening relationships. Finding common ground, showing respect, and being positive are examples of actions one can take to improve being likable.

An article in the Washington Post demonstrates this fact in politics as well as it highlights the defeat of D.C. mayor, Adian Fenty.

Here is an example of a person that most people approved of what he did but disliked him enough to kick him out (you may need to scroll up to the top to see the article).

The learning point? Likeability is important in every situation where trust is a factor, so be more likable and you'll be more successful.

Comments

From Tactical to Strategic—Shifting Services Priorities

When services inside of product companies were seen as tactical cost centers, the mandate was clear: make the product work, keep the customer happy, and manage costs. Smart services executives did their job and kept their heads down.

However, as services have transitioned to strategic profit centers and contribution expectations have increased, the services business is under much greater scrutiny. Hence, services leadership must re-think their priorities and figure out how to shift emphasis from enabling products to enhancing the business of their customers.

Stuff Rolls Downhill

My experience is that much of services activities center around problems that never should have occurred. Poor product design drives services issues that never go away, sucking up valuable resources for the life of the product. Opportunities to move the services business ahead are mired in the day-to-day tactical world of dealing with problems that should and could have been avoided.

A large proportion of these problems can be eliminated by proper thinking and planning early in the product development cycle. Experience shows that proactive, aggressive input by seasoned services professionals from the get-go is the key.

How well are you doing in impacting product design early?

Gain insights and learn from your peers. Participate in this survey on designing products for serviceability.
Comments

5 Steps to Selling Services Success—Step Two

Step Two: Align the System with the Strategy

Adjust your sales performance management system (objectives, tools, rewards, consequences, and feedback) to align with your new services selling strategy.

A. Fitting performance specifications. First, make it crystal clear that selling services is now an important focus of the company and an important required responsibility of the sales force. These expectations should be translated into quantifiable services sales goals (how much, what type, when) and should be in place and outlined in all sellers’ quotas and in their performance plan.

B. Adequate resources. You must have the necessary knowledge, skills, and tools supported by quick and easy access to your knowledge management system and internal experts. Most of this is best introduced through training, as discussed below.

C. Minimal interference. In all probability, you have just added more responsibility and more work to your sellers, but have not taken away any of their product sales quotas. To give your sellers the time to learn and practice how to sell services in the field, you need to minimize or eliminate secondary expectations. For example, for the first six months, ask the marketing department to eliminate all requests of the sales force, minimize the amount of time you expect sellers to take executives around to visit customers— unless those visits include services sales coaching by the executive—try to hold off involving your salespeople in task forces, and reduce required paperwork and all the other things that keep them out of the field selling services along with products. Minimizing interference will not only free up time for your sellers to learn how to better sell services, it also will take away excuses for non-performance.

D. Appropriate consequences. First, add a carrot—link the achievement of services targets to lucrative incentives. You can scale back later. In an attempt to get the attention of your sales force, make sure you are paying a higher percentage of bonus on services compared to products. In addition, tack on some highly visible bonuses (five-day cruise for two, twin Harleys, country club memberships—whatever gets their interest) to generate some excitement when your box sellers make good services sales. Your best sellers like to compete among themselves, and this is a highly visible way to do it. If you really want to generate maximum interest in selling services, make sure the spouses are aware of the incentive program. They can apply pressure that sales management can never match. Second, add a stick—put negative consequences in place if services selling goals are not met (no trip to the Bahamas for the services slackers, no product bonuses if services sales goals are not achieved). Punishment is a strong word, but necessary nonetheless. If your top product seller, Ace Flanagan, does poorly at selling services, put him on probation and let him know that job security requires services sales maturity. You will be sending a strong signal.

E. Quality feedback. The faster you get reliable performance feedback to people, the more likely they will self-direct their behavior to meet expectations and gain the positive incentives. Ideally, your sellers should be able to access their performance-to-goal anywhere, anytime. And, of course, management attention, encouragement, and coaching will increase the probability of repeatable, sustainable performance. Start every sales meeting with the selling services review of performance to demonstrate its importance and generate motivation.

The above process seems logical, doesn’t it? These are classic, proven steps of how to change people performance. Yet I rarely see organizations that address all of these points from the start. Most executives will set services targets and provide solid incentives, then expect/hope/demand that selling behavior changes. It will not. The gap is too large, and the change is too scary. Without meaningful ramifications for not selling services, you are wasting your time. The result will be dismal (if any) increases in services sales and a year of frustration for management.

The important thing to remember here is to do all of these steps, or don’t do them at all. But often management is very reluctant to put negative consequences in place around not selling services. (Maybe all the sellers will revolt!) Even if they put the negative consequences in place, it takes a steel-backed sales executive to keep the top-producing product seller (and his or her spouse) from making the trip to Rio for not selling enough services. (Maybe he will quit!) Finally, most product sellers, no matter how effective they are in that role, find it hard to transition to selling the invisible.

GIST: Getting the sales force to attempt to sell services is only effective when:

  • Objectives and metrics requiring them to sell services are a part of the selling package.

  • Lucrative incentives are in place for selling services.

  • There are meaningful negative consequences if their selling services objectives are not met.

  • Management actually enforces the significant negative consequences if selling services objectives are not met.

  • If you put a gun to their head, the sellers could effectively sell services on their own.

Comments